Sunday, July 22, 2007

The Most Valuable Question You May Ever Ask

Reproduced with permission from author

The Most Valuable Question You May Ever Ask

The Most Valuable Question

by Jack Canfield

As you begin to take action toward the fulfillment of your goals and dreams, you must realize that not every action will be perfect.

Not every action will produce the desired result. Not every action will work.

Making mistakes, getting it almost right, and experimenting to see what happens are all part of the process of eventually getting it right.

Thomas Edison is reported to have tried over 2,000 different experiments that failed before he finally got the light bulb to work. He once told a reporter that, from his perspective, he had never failed at all. Inventing the light bulb was just a 2,000-step process. If you can adopt that attitude, then you can be free to take an action, notice what result you get, and then adjust your next actions based on the feedback you have received.

Ready, Fire, Aim!
Don’t be afraid to just jump in and get started moving toward your goals. As long as you pay attention to the feedback you receive, you will make progress. Just getting into the game and firing allows you to correct and refine your aim.

The Most Valuable Question You May Ever Learn
In the 1980s, a multimillionaire businessman taught me a question that radically changed the quality of my life. So what is this magical question that can improve the quality of every relationship you are in, every product you produce, every service you deliver, every meeting you conduct, every class you teach and every transaction you enter into?

Here it is:

“On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the quality
of our relationship during the last week?”

Here are a number of variations on the same question that have served me well over the years...

“On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate…

• our service? • my teaching?
• our product? • this class/seminar/workshop?
• this meeting? • our date/vacation?
• our performance? • this meal?
• my coaching/managing? • this book/recording/show?
• my parenting/babysitting?

Any answer less than a 10 always gets this follow-up question:

“What would it take to make it a 10?”

This is where the *really* valuable information comes from. Knowing that a person is dissatisfied is not enough. Knowing in detail what will satisfy them gives you the information you need to do whatever it takes to create a winning product, service or relationship.

There Are Two Kinds of Feedback
There are two kinds of feedback you might encounter – negative and positive. We tend to prefer the positive – that is, results, money, praise, promotion, raise, awards, happiness, inner-peace, etc. It feels betters. It tells us we are on course and doing the right thing.

We tend not to like negative feedback – lack of results, little or no money, criticism, poor evaluations, complaints, unhappiness, inner conflict, pain, etc.

However, there is as much useful data in negative feedback as there is in positive feedback. It tells us that we are off course, headed in the wrong direction, doing the wrong thing. This is priceless information!

In fact, it’s so valuable that one of the most useful projects you could undertake is to change how you respond to negative feedback. I like to refer to negative feedback as information for “improvement opportunities.” Here is a place where I can get better.

Ask Yourself for Feedback
In addition to asking others for feedback, you need to ask yourself for feedback, too. More than any other source of feedback, your body will tell you whether or not you are on course or not. When you are relaxed and happy, your body is telling you that you are on track. When you are constantly exhausted, tense, in pain, unhappy and angry, then you are off track.

Take time to listen to what your body is saying to you. Take time to listen to your physical sensations and your feelings. They are sending you important messages. Are you listening?

Remember, Feedback Is Simply Information
You don’t have to take it personally. Just welcome it and use it.

For more on Using Feedback to Your Advantage, review Principle #19 in The Success Principles. It’s one of the most important principles you can apply.

© 2007 Jack Canfield

You Got To Be Smarter Than This

If you are an employer, and one of your employees was accused for embezzlement, would you suspend his position until he's clear of the accusation, or would you let him work regardless?

If you are a parent, and the private tutor you hired last month was suspected of molesting his female students, would you still ask him to come and teach your daughter before he is cleared of all charges?

Now read this:

Zakaria can continue as rep

roslina@thestar.com.my

PEKAN: Port Klang state assemblyman Datuk Zakaria Md Deros, who is facing 39 charges under the Companies’ Act with five other people, can continue serving his constituents until the court makes its decision.

Selangor Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohamad Khir Toyo said everyone should wait for the outcome of the legal proceedings before jumping to conclusions.

“This is the problem with Malaysians. They love to jump to conclusions.

“It is not right. We should wait and see the outcome of the legal proceedings first. For the time being, he can continue with his duties as a state assemblyman,” he told reporters after opening the Pekan Wanita Umno delegates’ meeting here yesterday.

Dr Mohamad Khir also said he was expecting a report from the state Umno secretary.

Zakaria and the five directors of Harvest Court Industries Bhd and Titi Steel Sdn Bhd were supposed to be charged on Friday but all failed to turn up in court.

The companies were being taken to court by the Companies Commission for four offences, namely failure to notify change of address, failure to hold an annual general meeting, failure to submit financial statements and failure to submit profit-and-loss accounts.

Dr Mohamad Khir also said Umno leaders and members must not be apologetic when dealing with matters involving the National Economic Policy (NEP) and Malay rights.

“What is wrong if there are more Malays in the civil service and armed forces especially if they are able to perform. Let them continue with their work.

“However, there are those who will make up excuses when posed with questions related to the NEP and Malay rights,” he added.

Dr Mohamad Khir, who is a party supreme council member, said the party’s lifeline was based on two things – religion and race – because its struggles had always been on upholding Islam and safeguarding the rights of Malays.

Earlier in his speech, he said it would weaken the party if members and leaders were being too apologetic about Islam and Malay rights.


Malaysians, you got to be smarter than them. So make the right choice. Choose the right person.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

On Your Mark, Get Set, WRITE!!~~

By Sharon Bakar:

Getting Started

I very much enjoyed Lydia's post about how she got started as a writer and thought I'd respond. I did try to leave a comment over there, but it somehow disappeared into the ether. And anyway I'd rather like to run with the ball!

I can't remember a time when I didn't want to write. At school I had this great running rivalry with my best friend Helen to see which of us could write the best composition for English classes. I ignored all other homework completely to put aside time to write because my poem or story had to be the best. We both wrote well above and beyond the call of duty, pages and pages where one or two would have sufficed. Helen always got a slightly higher grade though (and is now a published poet).

I still have my English exercise books (below) filled with my scribblings. My writing was frequently melodramatic and wonderfully florid! And always full of spelling errors. (Mild dyslexia?) It's pretty embarrassing to read them now.

I also started a diary in 1969 and kept it right up to the time I got married in 1990. (Too much honest writing left lying around probably wasn't a very good idea ... particularly as a diary is always a space for a good sound off! Keeping an online password protected journal was a substitute later on.)

But I digress.

I got my first poems published at 13 in the Coventry Evening Telegraph and my first boyfriend, a gardener called Francis, was one of my fans ... although on the two occasions we actually met up for a date, I was so much taller than him that I walked in the gutter while he walked on the pavement!

Although I'd always told myself one day I'd love to write. I didn't start writing seriously until I was in my 40's. I guess that's a good point at which to evaluate your life since it hits you that the sand is slipping through the hour glass (speeding up, even) and if you don't do the things you want to do now, you're probably never gonna.

But there was always the fear - would I measure up or end up disappointing myself in an area that meant so much to me? My favourite writers like Annie Proulx wagged their fingers at me saying "You'll never measure up." Spoilsports!

I also didn't know how to "get into" writing.

So when I saw an ad for a correspondence course with The Open College for the Arts, I decided to give it a go. I found the materials they sent very useful, and the tutor I was assigned to gave me excellent feedback. But I didn't finish the course because:

First of all, I lost my nerve several units in when there was a big jump from simple exercises involving description to suddenly writing a complete short story. (How the hell do I think up a plot, I thought, in the days before I realised that plots can just happen onto paper if you let them.) Looking back, I think the course was aimed at more experienced writers.

Secondly, because this was in the days before the internet had really taken off (and OCA was a particularly slow adopter!), each assignment had to be mailed to the UK (with an international reply coupon inside it for the postage), and then there was a long wait for it to come back to me. My tutor felt so far away!

Thirdly, only my tutor saw my assignment and (afraid to show my efforts to those close to me)
I had no chance to see how other readers reacted to it. I felt so lonely!

Much more helpful to me was a book I found in a bookshop in London: Writing for Self-Discovery: A Personal Guide to Creative Writing by Myra Schneider and John Killick which is a fantastic collection of exercises for exploring the material from your own life and experience. (The book appears to be currently out of print, but you can buy it from Abebooks for as little as US$1.)

I went crazy, filling notebook after notebook with recollection and thoughts and fiction and dreams. I never knew I had so much inside that wanted to break free.

There were many other useful books, and I should say more about these, but this one was my catalyst, my turning point.

I signed up with Writers Village which offers a whole range of short courses for one very reasonable joining fee and found friends and support. The course material is online, and the work posted to a bulletin board and feedback given by your coursemates rather than a tutor. The atmosphere was supportive and friendly, I made some writing buddies across the world (Most of the participants are from the US.) and the first two short stories I had published grew from assignments I posted there.

I also did a creative writing course organised by author Chuah Guat Eng at Silverfish. This was the first time I'd written with others and my - what a heady experience it turned out to be - with moments of real magic when we read back our pieces. Much much better than scribbling away lonely and alone!

But the teacher/trainer in me said ... hey ho, I want to encourage others to write and think I can do this better ... and that's why and how my own course for beginners was born. (And it sounds as if Lydia is thinking along these lines too ... good for her!)

I've just finished one run of it at the British Council and hope that the next will be in November, when I finish the project I'm currently involved with and have had a chance to rediscover my Mat Salleh roots in the UK for a few weeks.

There are lots of threads here I might pick up on another day.

But like Lydia I'd love to know, what got YOU writing?

--------------------------------------
Sharon Bakar
Location: Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MY

British but have lived in Malaysia for more than 20 years and very much at home here. I write on books for a number of publications and teach creative writing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Lydia Teh:

Writing Courses

Every now and then I get emails asking about the writing course I took. I just received another one this week. I’m going to blog about this so that in future, I could just direct the questioner here.

In 1995 I enrolled in a correspondence course from The Writing School, then based in Singapore. The last I heard, it has moved its operation to Australia. It seems they’re also operating in Canada. Then I paid RM1,500 for the 20-lesson course. Today the fees has ballooned.

They send you one lesson and assignment at a time. After you’ve completed it, you mail it back and wait for the next lesson and assignment.

When I took this course, the internet hasn’t exploded in a big way. Today there’s an ocean of writing know-how you can glean from the internet and writing books. What I benefitted most from the course wasn’t the materials provided. It was the training that was invaluable : forcing myself to sit down and complete a writing assignment. And I did sell some of the pieces I wrote for the school. In fact, I broke into print in the NST with an article about my grandfather. I later rewrote the story for my book, Life’s Like That - Scenes from Malaysian Life.The hefty fees also paid a part in kicking the butt. After spending a small fortune on it, the least I could do for myself was to complete the course and make it pay for itself.

Are there writing courses run here? As far as I know, Sharon Bakar runs an 8-week course (classes are held once a week for two hours per session). I’ve attended the sessions held at the British Council. It was great fun to write in a group. If you’re just starting out, I’d recommend Sharon’s course in ‘Getting started - finding the flow.’ She’s a great teacher, very encouraging and personable. Course fees is between RM350 to RM400.

95% also run some writing courses periodically. David Byck, author of It’s a Long Way to the Floor attended this. Fees is quite substantial though.

When Beth Yahp is back in Malaysia, she conducts writing workshops like this one. Her next workshop will be held on 18 and 25 August 2007. It costs RM450 (RM350 for students and unemployed).

If you don’t want to spend the money, you can check out these free mini courses run by BBC.

Whichever route you take, at the end of the day, you still have to sit down and write. That’s the only way you can get your work out. And don’t forget to read. A writer has to read in order to improve.

Having said that, if you have the money and time to spare, go enrol in a writing course. It’s not just the learning that’s fun, it’s the mingling with like-minded people. I’ve attended several workshops and seminars and don’t mind going for more, if not for my other half who keeps insisting, “It’s time for you to stop attending courses. You should be conducting them already.”

---------------------------------------------------
A desperately writing housewife with one husband, four kids (from 6 to 17) and a couple of sparrows trying to nest in her house.

Author of three books:

1. Congratulations! You have won - A guidebook on how to maximize your chances of winning competitions - Malita Jaya, 2001

2. Life’s Like That - Scenes from Malaysian Life - Pelanduk Publications, 2004

3. Honk If You’re Malaysian - MPH Publishing, Jan 2007

Her articles have been published in magazines, newspapers and websites. She’s a columnist with Yellow Post, a weekly newspaper and she writes the occasional Word’s Up, Eh Poh Nim column in The Star’s Mind Our English page. She was named a Best Teleworking Mom by Nestle and e-homemakers.net in 2004.

Location : Klang, Malaysia

------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, LET'S ROCK AND WRITE!!~~~

Nat Tan's Statement on His Detention (Eng & BM)

Four Days Under the OSA

I was arrested on Friday, the 13th of July at approximately 4.30pm in the carpark basement (B3) of Phileo Damansara I by about four to five policemen.

While originally being taken in for questioning, the police arrested me when I conveyed to them my lawyers advice that I should not accompany the police to their office unaccompanied by legal counsel.

From Phileo Damansara, I was taken to my house where the police confiscated my computer, some CD’s and some documents.

From the moment I was arrested until about 11 pm, I was not allowed to speak to anyone I knew, or inform anybody of my whereabouts.

I later learnt that this caused an immense and completely avoidable amount of stress and anxiety amongst my loved ones.

I was eventually made to understand that I was arrested in connection to accusations made on the internet regarding Datuk Johari Baharum.

The connection to me was based on a comment made on my blog that was made by an anonymous commentor on the 10th of Februrary, 2007.

It was prepostorous of the police to suspect me of publishing these accusations based on documents protected by the Official Secrets Act that were supposedly in my posessesion. There is absolutely nothing even remotely resembling proof to substantiate such claims.

Throughout my detention, the police employed various questioning strategies in what struck me strongly as a concerted attempt to make me admit to things that I had not done.

The police also subjected me to various rounds of questioning between about 5.30pm and 9pm by different police officers who all kept asking me the same questions. I later learnt that questioning at such late hours was in fact illegal.

One of the officers questioning me that evening who refused to identify himself threatened to slap me and throw me across the room.

Not having access to legal counsel, I refused to answer in detail any questions the police posed in their extremely suspicious manner.

The situation worsened on Saturday, the 14th of July.

Despite my repeated appeals to the police officers accompanying me to court to be produced before the magistrate for the remand hearing, they absolutely refused to notify my family or, more importantly, my lawyers that I was to be produced in court.

This caused in me a great deal of undue stress because I feared that I would be forced to face the magistrate without any legal representation.

Entirely by a stroke of luck, a lawyer at the magistrate’s court was able to assist me in contacting my lawyer, R Sivarasa. Had said lawyer not been present, I may have not been given the opportunity to be represented by counsel during my hearing, and my remand order may have been for fourteen days instead of for four.

Even after my lawyer arrived, the police made every possible effort to block me from consulting with my lawyers, denying me extremely basic human rights connected to judicial due process. This even included repeatedly trying to spy and eavsdrop on the conversations I was attempting to have with my lawyers.

After the remand order was allowed, the police continued to pursue the same line of questioning.

Having being advised by my lawyer during my remand hearing not to answer any questions or sign any statements, I refused to answer the increasingly combative line of questioning by the police.

On Saturday itself, a senior officer employed physical means in an attempt to intimidate me into answering their questions. This included shoving me into a chair while I was standing handcuffed.

Although I had stated my intent to exercise my right to silence, and despite my lawyer’s argument that the police had all the evidence they required to investigate me, the police’s insistence on holding me for all four days proved a complete waste of my time and of police resources. I was also made to endure unhygenic and pitifully substandard accomdations in the lockup throughout this time.

All other attempts to pressure and coerce me into providing information under adverse conditions failed. Finally, on Monday, I was allowed to see my family, who conveyed to me fresh advice from my lawyer regarding what information I could provide.

Armed at last with the knowledge that I had been seeking since Friday, I was more than happy to provide all the information I had available to the police.

The entire ordeal for both myself and the police could have been avoided if the police had extended some basic human courtesy and decency in allowing me to consult fully with legal counsel before cooperating with the police, which I was more than happy to do under fair and reasonable circumstances.

*

I fear greatly that my arrest despite the non-existent ties between the accusations against Datuk Johari and myself portend badly for Malaysia’s abilty to deal with true cyber crime.

The fact that I appear to be the best suspect they could arrest in relation to this case indicates that the police do not understand how the internet works, and are at a complete loss as to how to handle true cyber crime.

In my particular case as well, the government and police appear to be sending a signal that while irresponsible bloggers roam free, responsible bloggers who moderate their comments and put a name to their writing are more likely to end up as targets. This policy could not possibly be more ill formed and counterproductive.

Given certain statements in the press recently, I unfortunately cannot rule out completely that the substandard and rushed nature of this investigation is the result of political meddling and pressure in police affairs.

I am also gravely concerned because as my lawyer pointed out in the remand hearing, arrests should take place at the conclusion of an investigation, and not at the beginning of one. What happened to me is beyond doubt an absolute travesty of this principle.

If the police continue in their attempts to procur information from innocent citizens in bad faith and through questionable means such as by coercing information from individuals isolated from legal counsel and outside support, they will find themselves failing the public in their duty to protect Malaysians from true criminal activity.

*

This entire episode smacks of intimidation. Ongoing and unrelenting intimidation towards social activists, internet writers and opposition supporters.

The ranking officer in the unit investigating me even took the time to ‘advise’ me to emulate the example and career trajectories of individuals like Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye. The same officer also warned me to be considerate to my parents as I choose my career paths.

While I appreciate the advice, I wish to reiterate here that the causes I have chosen were chosen with due care and consideration, and after thorough analysis of the state of Malaysia’s social and political climate. I love my parents very much, and hate the fact that this episode has caused them such unhappiness. However, my responsibility is also to my future children, and the Malaysia they will inherit.

Any assumptions that my experience will dissuade other activists and citizens of conscience from exerting all our energies in upholding their responsibilities to their parents, their children, and to all of Malaysia are sadly, sadly misplaced.

My time with the police taught me that all the efforts by political parties and civil society to curb the excesses of the police and the government have proven extremely effective.

The police were extremely concerned that they might be portrayed in a bad light after my release, and took a number of steps to ensure that they did not do things that they knew would be taken up and publicised by activists. I am thus extremely grateful for the efforts of those that have fought before me to make Malaysia a more just and secure place for its citizens.

It is impossible to endure an experience such as mine without having one’s fears and discomfort increased, even in one’s own homeland.

The true mark of human strength however is the manner in which we deal with these fears.

I have chosen not to let my fears overcome me, and as a member of KeADILan and other activist groups, I have instead chosen to draw inspiration from those who have walked these paths before me and continue refusing to spare any effort whatsoever in our ongoing endeavours to uphold justice for all throughout the homeland we love.

*

Lastly, I would like to take this opportunity to express my deepest, most sincerely heartfelt thanks to every single individual and organisation who voiced their support for me throughout this difficult episode. I know this was especially difficult for all of my family and my girlfriend Soon Li Tsin, but despite their pain, they pulled through in every way imaginable to provide me every strength I needed to overcome.

I am not exaggerating in the least when I say the truly touching support I received carried me through the entire ordeal. To all my guardian angles, once again, thank you truly.

Nathaniel Tan
*

Empat Hari Di Bawah OSA

Saya ditahan pada Jumaat, 13 Julai pada lebih kurang 4.30pm di kawasan tempat letak kereta (B3) Phileo Damansara I oleh 3 - 4 orang polis.

Walaupun asalnya dibawa ke balai untuk disoal, saya ditahan apabila memaklumkan kepada polis bahawa saya dinasihati peguam untuk tidak mengikut polis secara sendiri tanpa peguam.

Dari Phileo Damansara, saya dibawa ke rumah saya di mana polis merampas komputer saya, beberapa CD dan beberapa dokumen.

Dari saat saya ditahan sehingga lebih kurang 11pm, saya tidak dibenarkan untuk bercakap dengan mana-mana kenalan saya, atau maklumkan sesiapapun mengenai lokasi saya.

Perkara ini merupakan suatu pengalaman yang pahit dan menderita bagi keluarga dan kawan-kawan saya.

Saya akhirnya dimaklumkan bahawa saya ditahan berkaitan dengan tuduhan yang dibuat di internet ke atas Datuk Johari Baharum.

Kaitan kes ini kepada saya adalah berdasarkan sebuah komen yang dibuat di blog saya oleh seorang yang identitinya tidak diketahui pada 10 Februari, 2007.

Tidak wajar sama sekali pihak polis mensyaki saya menerbitkan tomahan kepada Datuk Johari berasaskan dokumen rahsia rasmi yang disyaki berada dalam kepunyaan saya. Tiada bukti langsung untuk mengesahkan tuduhan ke atas saya tersebut.

Semasa saya ditahan, polis menggunakan pelbagai strategi dalam menyoal siasat saya yang saya percayai adalah percubaan untuk membuat saya mengakui kepada tindakan-tindakan yang saya tidak pernah buat.

Polis juga soal-siasat saya di antara 5.30pm sehingga 9pm oleh anggota-anggota polis yang berbeza tetapi yang semua bertanya soalan yang sama. Selepas dilepaskan, saya dapat tahu bahawa soal-siasat pada waktu tersebut tidak sah di sisi undang-undang.

Satu daripada pegawai yang menyoal saya malam itu dan enggan memberi namanya mengugut untuk melempar saya dan mencampak saya ke seberang bilik.

Oleh kerana tidak dapat berjumpa dengan peguam, saya enggan menjawab secara terperinci mana-mana soalan polis.

Situasi bertambah teruk pada Sabtu, 14 Julai.

Walaupun saya menyeru beberapa kali kepada polis yang mengiringi saya ke mahkamah reman supaya menghubungi peguam dan keluarga saya untuk maklumkan bahawa saya dibawa ke mahkamah, mereka enggan berbuat sedemikian.

Ini menyebabkan saya terasa amat tertekan kerana saya takut akan menghadapi majistret tanpa peguam.

Saya amat bertuah, kerana seorang peguam di mahkamah menolong saya untuk menghubungi peguam saya, R Sivarasa. Jika peguam tersebut tiada di mahkhamah dan sanggup menghubungi Sivarasa, saya mungkin akan direman untuk 14 hari dan bukan 4.

Selepas peguam saya tiba, polis cuba sedaya upaya untuk menghalang saya dari bercakap kepada peguam saya. Dengan itu, mereka mencabuli hak asasi saya yang berkaitan dengan prosedur keadilan. Ini termasuk cubaan untuk mengintip dan curi-curi dengar kepada perbualan antara saya dengan peguam.

Selepas reman dibenarkan, polis meneruskan penyoalsiasatan terhadap saya.

Oleh kerana saya dinasihati oleh peguam saya supaya tidak menjawab mana-mana soalan atau menandatangani apa-apa, saya enggan menjawab soalan-soalan polis yang semakin bersikap aggresif.

Pada hari Sabtu itu, seorang pegawai atasan bersikap kasar terhadap saya ketika menyoal saya. Ini termasuk menolak saya ke dalam kerusi ketika saya berdiri dan digari.

Oleh kerana saya sudah memaklumkan kehendak saya untuk menggunakan hak saya untuk berdiam diri, keputusan polis untuk menahan saya untuk 4 hari tersebut amat membuangkan masa saya dan tenaga kerja polis. Dalam seluruh waktu ini, saya terpaksa bermalam di lokap dalam keadaan yang teruk dan tidak sihat.

Semua percubaan untuk menekan saya sehingga memberi keterangan gagal. Akhirnya, pada hari Isnin, saya dibenarkan menjumpa keluarga saya, yang memaklumkan kepada saya nasihat baru dari peguam mengenai maklumat yang saya boleh beri kepada polis.

Saya seterusnya dengan ringan hati memberi segala keterangan yang diminta oleh polis.

Segala masalah-masalah yang dialami oleh kedua-dua pihak saya dan polis sebenarnya dapat dielakkan sekiranya polis cukup berhemah untuk membenarkan saya berbincang secara bebas dengan peguam saya sebelum memberi keterangan.

*

Saya amat khuatir bahawa penahanan saya, walaupun tiada kaitan langsung dengan tuduhan atas Datuk Johari, menunjukkan bahawa PDRM sebenarnya tiada kepakaran yang mencukupi untuk menangani masalah jenayah siber.

Kerajaan dan polis nampaknya memberi isyarat bahawa penulis di internet yang tidak bertanggungjawab dapat berleluasa secara bebas, manakala penulis di internet yang bertanggungjawab dan menggunakan nama sebenar akan menjadi sasaran. Dasar ini langsung tiada asas yang kukuh dan bersifat kounter produktif.

Memandangkan kenyataan dalam akhbar kebelangkan ini, saya malangnya tidak boleh menafikan kemungkinan bahawa cara penyiasatan ini dijalankan secara huru-hara adalah akibat daripada campurtangan politik dan tekanan terhadap urusan polis.

Saya juga amat risau kerana seperti yang dimaklumkan oleh peguam saya semasa di mahkamah reman, penahanan harus dibuat pada hujung sebuah penyiasatan dan bukan pada mulanya. Apa yang terjadi jelas bercanggah dengan prinsip ini.

Jika polis berterus dalam percubaan mereka untuk mendapat maklumat dari rakyat dengan cara-cara yang amat mencurigakan seperti yang saya alami, mereka akan gagal dalam usaha mereka untuk melindungi rakyat Malaysia dari jenayah.

*

Peristiwa ini mengandungi terlalu ramai unsur intimidasi - intimidasi terhadap aktivis, penulis internet dan penyokong pembangkang.

Seorang pegawai tinggi dalam unit yang menyiasati saya pun ‘menasihati’ saya supaya mencontohi individu seperti Tan Sri Lee Lam Thye. Pegawai tersebut juga memberi amaran supaya menitikberatkan ibubapa saya apabila memilih kerjaya saya.

Walaupun saya menghargai nasihat tersebut dan amat menyayangi ibubapa saya, saya terpaksa juga menitikberatkan masa depan bakal-bakal anak saya serta Malaysia yang akan saya tinggalkan untuk mereka.

Mana-mana anggapan bahawa pengalaman saya akan menakutkan atau melemahkan semangat rakyat yang berjuang untuk menyempurnakan tanggungjawab mereka kepada ibubapa, anak dan kepada semua Malaysia salah sama sekali.

Masa saya dengan polis telah menunjukkan bahawa segala usaha oleh parti-parti politik dan masyarakat mandani untuk membantah keterlaluan polis dan kerajaan telah membuahkan hasil.

Polis amat prihatin terhadap imej mereka selepas saya dibebaskan, dan mengambil langkah supaya tidak melakukan perkara-perkara yang mereka sedar akan dihebohkan oleh aktivis-aktivis. Oleh itu, saya amat berterima kasih kepada usaha-usaha mereka yang telah berjuang sebelum saya untuk menjadikan Malaysia sebuah negara yang adil dan selamat.

Tidak mungkin seseorang mengalami pengalaman sebegini tanpa merasa lebih takut dan tidak selesa, walaupun di tanahair sendiri.

Walaubagaimanapun, tanda sebenar kekuatan insan adalah cara di mana kita pilih untuk hidup dengan ketakutan tersebut.

Saya telah pilih untuk tidak membenarkan rasa takut saya menguasai saya. Sebaliknya, sebagai ahli KeADILan dan rakyat yang sedar, saya telah pilih untuk mencontohi semua mereka yang telah mendahului saya dalam mengambil perjalanan ini dan berusaha sedaya upaya untuk menegakkan keadilan untuk semua di Malayia yang kita cintai.

*

Akhirnya, saya ingin mengucapkan terima kasih setinggi-tingginya kepada setiap individu dan organisasi yang menyuarakan sokongan mereka untuk saya dalam waktu yang susah ini. Saya sedar bahawa keluarga saya dan teman wanita saya Soon Li Tsin terutamanya amat menderita pada waktu ini, tetapi walaupun dalam keadaan begitu, mereka berjaya menunjukkan penuh sokongan dan inilah yang memberi kekuatan yang diperlukan saya untuk menghadapi ujian ini.

Sokongan yang betul-betul amat mengharukan ini telah mengangkat saya pada setiap tahap kesusahan ini. Kepada semua malaikat yang menjaga saya, sekali lagi, saya ucapkan ribuan terima kasih.

Nathaniel Tan

To think that we entrusted our safety to them...

The Price of Healthcare

Written by Yvonne Foong
Thursday, 19 July 2007

I was overjoyed when Dr. Friedman offered to remove my brain tumour for free. The phone call from the U.S. was brief, but he spoke with such confidence, I knew his offer would come true.

After weeks of planning, visa application, and paperwork, I made my way to Los Angeles three months later. The trip across the ocean proved refreshing. It was my first time travelling alone to a foreign country. What’s more? I went there to see someone who could entirely remove the tumour with confidence.

But the trip was not without glitches. Due to some misunderstanding, the hospital did not expect me turning up so early. There were more documents to settle, and a surgery date had to be scheduled beforehand. With my limited experience with healthcare in Malaysia, I did not expect the U.S. to be different.

Since I caught the hospital unprepared, I had to put up at the hotel for two nights. My aunt who paid the cost was not pleased. She gave me an earful, after harassing the hospital president and raised her voice at Dr. Friedman’s secretary.

It left me traumatised. My aunt convinced me that Dr. Friedman was angry and said I was ungrateful. I cried a bucketful of tears and beat myself up. When I met Dr. Friedman at House Clinic the following day, I bowed my head low, thinking the worst would happen, just as what my aunt claimed.

After a short while waiting, the voice of a bright and confident man beamed from outside. Moments later, Dr. Friedman stepped in and introduced himself. “Wow! Your aunt was aggressive!”. That was all he said concerning my mistake. He ran through the surgery details and what he planned to do. Next, he picked up the phone and called the operation theatre, requesting for a slot on Monday, after explaining the unforeseen circumstances.

Before he left, Dr. Friedman pat me on the shoulder and said, “Don’t worry. We’ll take good care of you.”

I will never forget that scene. His assuring tone brought me close to tears, a total contrary to my aunt’s words.

Two years later, Dr. Friedman removed another tumour from me. This time, he de-bulked a skull-base tumour, in addition to the original procedure. “It’s called the Jugular Foramen Meningioma,” he explained. “Don’t worry. I will take care of you.”

Dr. Friedman does not charge me regular consultation fees, and I can e-mail him anytime.

Many don’t understand when I insist on having some tumours removed abroad. They think of it as a far-fetched luxury. But I did not arrive here easy. The years suffering at a government hospital bruised my heart. Some protested, saying there are good doctors. But little is made known about the place, run by a system so restricting, that I only saw my surgeon a month after every surgery. Without communication, the relationship between doctor and patient is non-existent. Other problems contribute to make the hospital a hellish place, but the root of all lies in weak relationships.

When my friend, Pei Lee, could not certainly tell me what was wrong with her spine, I knew she was left in the dark. With a new doctor seeing her each time, Pei Lee could not be sure of the situation. It reminded me of fear and uncertainty. My first instinct was to rescue Pei Lee from hell.

But to say that only government hospitals mistreat their patients would be an understatement. Even some in private practice neglect the duty of care. Last Wednesday, I raised some funds and brought Pei Lee to a private hospital. Upon hearing about her medical history, the doctor abruptly told her to go back to the government, explaining that his fees were expensive.

The doctor refused to run a simple test such as asking Pei Lee to walk in a straight line, or examine her in any way. I said she could not get her files from the hospital, and might need a new MRI, but the doctor cited the high cost again.

We decided to seek treatment elsewhere. On our way out, I told Pei Lee, “Don’t let that doctor intimidate you. He does not represent the whole medical profession!”.
--

Yvonne Foong is a freelance writer and blogger. Her writings can be found at her website ‘Fight for Tomorrow, or it May Never Come’. (http://www.yvonnefoong.com/ )

AI Statement on Arrest and Detention of Blogger

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL MALAYSIA
PRESS
STATEMENT

July 17, 2007

Arrest and detention of blogger undermined fundamental rights

Amnesty International would like to raise our concerns over the recently reported news of the arrest of blogger and PKR webmaster, Mr. Nathaniel Tan. We have serious concerns over the manner in which his arrest was executed and his remand process.

We believe that the police clearly abused the due process of investigation by arbitrarily arresting a person without due reason. The attitude of “arrest first and investigate later” which was highlighted by the Royal Police Commission affects a person’s freedom and rights without a just cause. Furthermore the maximum period remand application made by the police is a strong indicator that the police failed to conduct thorough investigations before the arrest.

It was reported that Nathaniel was merely requested to follow the plainclothes policeman believed to be from the Special Branch for questioning in the Bukit Aman police headquarters, without any notification given if he was arrested. We believe that the failure to disclose his status at the time of arrest was in fact deception on the part of the police to deny him access to his family and legal intervention which is provided by law. We are also concerned over the 6 hour absence of any information from the Bukit Aman police headquarters on the status of his arrest and his whereabouts is which is tantamount to an “enforced disappearance”.

The Royal Commission in its report highlighted that the Special Branch operates with a high degree of secrecy and confidentiality. There were allegation of torture and humiliating and degrading treatment inflicted by the Special Branch and concerns that the Special Branch may be manipulated by a party in power for political purposes. The Commission recommended making the Special Branch accountable and its powers and responsibilities to be spelt out in law so that it can function impartially and independently and to clearly define the term 'security' to avoid abuses of power. Amnesty International supports the Commission’s recommendations to make the Special Branch accountable and to clearly define the term 'security' to avoid abuses of power.

We also condemn the actions of the investigating police officers not to inform Nathaniel’s lawyers of the remand proceedings and their attempt to conduct the remand hearing without the presence of his lawyers. We are of the opinion that this is another example of abuse of power by the police and an infringement of the right to a fair hearing and to full and unhindered access to legal assistance.

We are also of the view that such abuses continues due to the continuing ignorance and failure on part of the police to implement the Royal Commissions recommendation for “A Principles and Code of Practice Relating to the Arrest and Detention of Persons”. This abuses are also due to the delay in implementation of the 2006 Parliamentary Select Committee on Criminal Law’s amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) to improve on remand procedures and on the rights of persons when arrested that has already been passed by the Parliament and signed by the King, but yet to be brought into force.

Amnesty International Malaysia strongly urges the Prime Minister to investigate the incident and implement the recommendations made by the Royal Commission without further delay. It is also crucial that the CPC amendments be implemented to ensure that the rule of law is observed and implemented by the police.

Background Information

The Royal Commission on Police in its report pointed out in several sections on the habit of “Arrest First, Investigate Later”- where arrests were made based on highly questionable “reasonable suspicion” or the likelihood to constitute criminal behaviour and in the context of mass arrests of persons allegedly loosely linked to a particular high profile crime. This practice indicates that the police fail to conduct investigations before an arrest is made hence caused wrongful detention of innocent persons.

The United Nations Declaration on the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance, as in Article 1 states that an act of enforced disappearance places the persons subjected thereto outside the protection of the law and inflicts severe suffering on them and their families. It constitutes a violation of the rules of international law guaranteeing, inter alia, the right to recognition as a person before the law, the right to liberty and security of the person and the right not to be subjected to torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. It also violates or constitutes a grave threat to the right to life.

In 2006, The Parliamentary Select Committee on Criminal Laws made significant amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code significant proposals on the Criminal Procedure Code to include the following. Amend section 117 of the CPC where offences which is punishable with imprisonment of less than 14 years, the magistrate may issue a remand order not more than four days on the first application and not more than three days on the second application and for an offence that is punishable with the death penalty or imprisonment of more than 14 years, the magistrate is empowered to grant up to seven days of remand order on the first application, followed by another maximum seven days on the second application. The committee has also proposed to insert a new section of 28A that specifically deals with the rights of a person arrested. The police will be required to inform the detainee on his ground of arrest as soon as possible; provide free-of-charge facilities for the detainee to inform his relative, friend or lawyer within 24 hours; and defer any interrogation until the detainee is given time to seek legal advice.

The Royal Commission in its report also proposed for “A Principles and Code of Practice Relating to the Arrest and Detention of Persons” to prevent torture and abuse of detainees. This proposed code of practice provides for an independent Custody Officer, who shall be responsible for the welfare and custody of every detainee, procedures for police interview including tape recordings, video surveillance and access to lawyers. The commission also emphasized in its report that the Code of Practice must be strictly adhered to by the police while affecting any arrest, whether under the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) or preventive laws and failure to comply should be subject to disciplinary proceedings.

Josef Roy Benedict

Executive Director

To become a member of AI please contact :
------------------------------------------------
Amnesty International
Malaysia
E6, 3rd Floor, Bangunan Khas,
Jalan 8/1E, 46050 Petaling Jaya,
Selangor, Malaysia
Tel : 03-79552680
Fax: 03-79552682
Email : aimalaysia@aimalaysia.org
Website : http://www.aimalaysia.org
- Defending human rights worldwide -

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Making Ulama More Relevant

Grabbed from http://www.bakrimusa.com/
First posted on www.Malaysia-Today.net July 8, 2007

The Raja Muda of Perak speaks for many when he stated at the recent Ulama Conference that an alim (pl: ulama) “must first build a credible image of himself so that his advice and views are accepted and valued.”

Unfortunately, the sad reality is that ulama in many Muslim countries, Malaysia included, have prostituted themselves as instruments of a repressive state. They behave less as spiritual leaders and more to provide religious legitimacy to brutal and unjust governments.

In Malaysia, where the government has totally co-opted the Islamic establishment, Islam is now less a faith and more a bureaucracy, with ulama preaching government propaganda instead of doing God’s work. How many ulama have spoken out against official corruption and gross abuses of human rights?

Islam in Malaysia is what the government says it is; one deviates at one’s own earthly peril. Many have been jailed without trial courtesy of the Internal Security Act, or sent to “rehabilitation camps” by sham Syariah Courts for practicing “deviationist” Islam. This is not the wisdom of Prophet Muhammad, s.a.w., but of Comrade Stalin.

On another level, today’s ulama remind me of physicians of yore. Then, physicians were put on a pedestal, their every pronouncement meekly accepted. Even the language to describe a physician’s advice was telling: “Doctor’s orders!”

This is still the prevailing ethos in the Third World. New doctors coming from there have difficulty accepting the fact that in America physicians are just professionals like others. Meaning, patients are your valued clients, not subservient customers. You have to explain your treatment plans, tests ordered, and medications prescribed. A request for a second opinion is not seen as a slight on your professional competence rather the expectation of an informed patient. And an informed patient is a better patient.

This transformation of American physicians did not occur magically. It is the consequence of three major factors: radical changes in medical education, the public becoming more informed in matters of health and diseases, and the fact that medical care is largely in the private sector. Doctors have to listen to their customers in order to survive economically.

Then there is the manner of training. Would-be doctors in America are well grounded in the humanities and social sciences (in addition to the prerequisite natural sciences) before entering medical school. Further, it is the rare medical student who lives in dorms; most live in the community. They are not cut off from the rest of society, as priests in monasteries, or ulama in their madrasahs. American patients are also better educated and well informed, with medical information readily available. These patients do not take kindly to a physician’s patronizing or “know it all” attitude.


Educating Ulama

Contrast that to the training of an alim. More than likely he (never she) had attended a religious school where the curriculum is severely constrained. His social circle is also similarly limited; having never encountered anyone from a different faith or of the opposite sex. This pattern is repeated at university. Would-be ulama thus dwell in a world totally alien from that of their parishioners. It is no surprise that their pronouncements have little relevance to the real world.

One ready solution would be to abolish religious schools. That however, would not be politically feasible. Besides, these schools are popular with Malays; the Islamic imprimatur sells. A better alternative would be to modernize the curriculum by broadening it to include more secular subjects. There is no reason why these religious schools cannot excel in secular subjects and thus produce their share of the nation’s future scientists and managers, just like religious schools in America. American Catholic schools provide such superior education that they attract many non-Catholics, including Muslim students.

At universities these future ulama should, like modern physicians (at least in America), have broad-based liberal education. An understanding of the humanities and the sciences (natural and social) would enhance their understanding of the Quran and Hadith. The contributions of ancient Muslim scholars were prodigious and monumental because their intellectual interests were broad. They did not differentiate between religious and secular knowledge. Contrast that to the insularity of today’s ulama and religious scholars.

If our ulama are well versed with and have insights from the social sciences, they would be in a better position to relate to and counsel their ummah. They would then be less likely to be simplistic when addressing serious problems of their congregation.

All too often when ulama are confronted with major social problems, be they AIDS, drug abuse, or out-of-wedlock childbirths, their responses have been nothing but the uttering of platitudes and mindless quotations of the Quran and hadith. Similarly when they issue fatwas (decrees), they do so without much thought. They simply give their declarations without any explanation or references to existing body of knowledge. No surprise then that their fatwas are often far detached from reality; and frequently ignored.

If only they would use the occasion of issuing the fatwa as an opportunity to educate the masses by engaging them, then these ulama would be doing themselves and their followers a great service. When judges render decisions, they have pages and pages of reasoning, citing relevant precedents. Our ulama should do no less with their fatwas.

Similarly, just as judges seek testimonies from experts before deciding on a case, ulama too must not hesitate to consult specialists in the relevant fields before issuing fatwas. I would go further and suggest that these ulama have public hearings on important issues before delivering their edicts.

I am appalled that ulama and religious scholars would issue fatwas on such complex matters as modern financial instruments like bonds or public health issues such as AIDS without first understanding them. These are new and daunting problems that earlier Muslims never had to face. Endlessly quoting ancient texts would shed little light except to illustrate general principles. It would be more useful to understand these modern issues by learning from practitioners of other disciplines, and then discern what aspects are or are not in compliance with the principles of Islam.

Quite apart from broadening the curriculum, the current education of the ulama must also be revamped. What passes for “education” in a religious class is nothing but indoctrination. The communication is strictly one way, from instructor to students.

I once attended what was supposed to be a graduate-level class in Islamic Studies. I was appalled at the lack of any intellectual discussion. When I tried to ask a question, I was patronizingly told that I could not even contemplate asking any when I was just beginning the course. I would have to wait at least until I have understood the whole material. Whereupon I retorted that if I had understood everything, then there is no need for my asking any question, or even taking the course!

The instructor’s mindset was telling, and is typical of many Islamic scholars and ulama. Even more revealing was the attitude of the students. These were adults, many professionals in their own right, yet they passively sat through the lecture.


Changing Ulama/Ummah Dynamics

Just as the physician/patient relationship is changing with the public being better informed on health matters, so too must the ulama/ummah dynamics, with average Muslims now more knowledgeable on matters of their faith. The days when the clergy class had exclusive access to religious knowledge went away with the advent of the printing press. The Internet further breached what little remains of that exclusivity.

If ulama persist in their role as gatekeepers to religious knowledge, then they risk becoming irrelevant. Through the Internet I can listen to khutbas and lectures given at leading Islamic centers. There is no need to subject myself to the boring reading of canned sermons prepared by the state. I can read it myself twice as fast, and without putting me to sleep.

On the other hand, if ulama were to assume the role of spiritual advisers, then they would have plenty to do in filling the large void in our modern lives, with problems of alienation and dislocations brought on by rapid urbanization and globalization. To effectively fill in this new role however, they would have to have knowledge and skills beyond the religious, just as a physician needs other skills beyond his narrow profession in order to succeed.

Today’s ulama need to be well versed in counseling skills, child development, family dynamics, and social work to meet the needs of their modern ummah. Muslims today would not be satisfied with someone only reciting the Quran; they could turn on the CD and listen to the most exquisite voices of the best qaris and qariyahs. Nor would today’s Muslims be satisfied with someone endlessly quoting the hadith. What we desperately need is someone who can relate the wisdom of the Quran and hadith to the problems we face day to day. That would demand a totally different set of skills from the ulama.

Ulama have to disengage themselves from the state. They should be the custodians of the ideals of the community; they should guide the ummah along the straight path. Most of all, our ulama should be our bulwark against the tyranny of the state, and not be its accomplice.

If we change how and what we teach our Islamic Studies students, we may get ulama who have a “credible image of himself so that his advice and views are accepted and valued.” That would be good for the ulama, the ummah, Malaysia, and Islam.

Desperate Attempt to Con A Crooked Man

Recently my email has become a haven for financial scams. Lotteries, "business" proposals, "unclaimed funds", etc. How the heck did they get my e-mail? Beats me. But this one caught my attention. Because whoever sent this claimed to be a lawyer, practicing in Malaysia. He even puts his office address, but minus the office contact number. Why, I wonder. Here's the e-mail:

Contact:
Barrister Ahmad Salim
Senior Advocate.
Office:
Law House
2ND Foor Wisma Yakin
Jalan Masjid 1
50450 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia .


My name is Ahmad Salim,an attorney at law.

I saw your contact and profile and decided that you could cooperate with me in this proposition.

I have a client who was deceased in 11th November, 2004. His heart condition was due to the death of all the members of his family in the Gulf Air Flight Crashes in Persian Gulf Near Bahrain Aired August 23, 2000 - 2:50 p.m. ET as reported on : http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0008/23/bn.08.html

I am contacting you because you have the same surname as my deceased client and i felt that you could help me in the distribution of funding that were left in my deceased client's bank account. This funding is closed to be declared un-serviceable by the bank as there were no indicated next of kin or next of beneficiary of the funding in the bank account.

The total amount of cash in the bank account of my deceased client is US$ 5.2 Million ( Say, Five Million, two Hundred Thousand United States dollars Only ), The bank had issued to me a notification to contact the next of kin of my deceased client for either to re-activate the bank account or to make claim of beneficiary, of the funding in the bank account, with a month surcharge of 6% to be deducted as an Escrow safe keeping fee of the bank account,so as to avoid the indefinite closure of the bank account.

My proposition to you is to seek your consent, and to present your kind self as the next-of-kin and beneficiary of my deceased client,since you have the same last name with him.

This means that the proceeds of his bank account would be paid to you as his next of kin or the legitimate beneficiary. When the proceeds in his bank account are paid to you, we would share the proceeds on a mutually agreed-upon percentage of 60% to me and 40% to your kind self.

All the legal documents to back up your claim as my client's next-of-kin would be provided by me. The most important thing I would need is your honest cooperation in this proposition.This would be done under a legitimate arrangement that would protect you from any breach of the law.

Sorry and over look this business proposition if it offends your moral and ethic values but please, contact me at once if you're interested by replying the mail.

Yours Sincerely,
Barr. Ahmad Salim
[ Principal Attorney].



There you have it. Of all the person who used "Ismat" as his/her last name (FYI, Muhammad Nor Ismat is my name. I didn't include my father's name for various personal reasons), I was chosen to be the heir of someone I never knew existed. Sounds like a story straight from a manga/anime. What I would like you, my friends, to do, is to help me verify this possible conman. I want to know if the office exists, and if it does, is there anyone by the name Ahmad Salim working there. If not, a police report is in order.

Come to think of it, why don't he contact Amir Hafizi instead? He plainly claimed that he wanted to become a millionaire ASAP, for goodness sake!! Amir, why don't you take my place?

Of Sensitivity and Understanding

I feel inclined to write about this after a conversation with a dearly beloved. It's about sensitivity towards other and understanding the other party. In this case I will specialize the article to evolve around sensitivity and understanding about Islam, as it seems that Islam has become one of the most ridiculed subject nowadays, much to my chagrin.

First, the sensitivity part. What sparked my desire to write about it is the release of Evans Almighty. I haven't watched it, as I'm not much of a movie buff. I'd rather read a thick book on motivation and self-development rather than to pay RM10 for a wasted 2 hours. Here's a review about the movie, stolen (I'm being true to myself here) from FilmThreat.com:

EVAN ALMIGHTY
by Michael Ferraro
2007, Rated PG, 95 minutes

Readers beware: this review contains minor plot spoilage…

There is something rather perplexing going on in Hollywood these days. Back in the early 1990s, “Terminator 2: Judgment Day” cost just over 100 million dollars to make. That movie had it all too: robots, computer-generated effects, blood, a body count, car chases, explosions, helicopters, buildings blowing up, guns, and motorcycles. Again, all of that was done with only $100 million and after 16 years, “T2” still looks better than most Hollywood big budget movies of today. Hell, just 4 years ago, “Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl” was done with about 140 million dollars and you can see that in the final product.

Then comes “Evan Almighty,” an unnecessary sequel to the equally unnecessary “Bruce Almighty” from 2003, which IMDB reports as having a budget $175,000,000. Where did all this money go? Perhaps due to its Christian themes, Universal just didn’t see a problem forking over such a ridiculous amount but do you think Hollywood will ever have the balls to pump $175,000,000 into a comedy relating to the Qur’an?

Regardless, “Evan Almighty” has Steve Carell once again playing Evan Baxter (Jim Carrey’s nemesis from the first film) who leaves his job as a news anchor to take a role as a congressman in Washington D.C. This greater calling has taken up so much of his time, that he rarely spends any time with his wife and three sons (fans of the Noah story will understand this coincidence). He is instead too infatuated with his newfound political career. Congressman Long (John Goodman) sees his dedication and tries to get him to support a bill that would give a giant hunk of land “back to the people” for development purposes that may be a little shadier than it appears. That’s when God shows up.

Since Evan’s political stance is to “change the world,” God (played by the man himself, Morgan Freeman) asks him to build an Ark, like Noah once did in the Book of Genesis in the Bible. Evan, albeit a bit skeptical, finally gives in to God’s request since the animals of the world won’t leave him alone. Pairs of various species show up like Dennis the Menace and create havoc everywhere he goes. This mayhem causes him to get suspended from his job, leaving him no choice but to grab a thousand-year-old hammer and get to work.

Okay, so let’s backtrack for a second. God plans on flooding the entire Earth once again and this is where the film’s budget was spent on, right? Wrong. It’s not the world at stake, like in Noah’s time. Instead, it’s only a few blocks of a suburban area. We as an audience are to believe that “God” (the Christian version of course) would seek the aid of a white politician to build an ark to save less than a hundred white people in suburbia, yet he chose to do nothing about the Holocaust?

An even better question: if only this one neighborhood is going to flood, why would he make animals travel from all over the world to seek shelter in the ark when their homes were never threatened? I’d be pissed if I was that impala who traveled all the way from Africa for no reason. Is God going to give this guy a ride home when it’s all over? Tell you what, just leave your brain at the door or you’ll leave the theater with a headache.

So there is no body count, no blood, no transforming robots, no explosions and no pirate ships sailing the high seas. All we get here are some Christian fables, animated animals and a computer-generated ark. All of this for that hefty price tag? It’s not like the special effects are top notch either. The blue/green screen work isn’t well disguised and the wide shots showing a multitude of computer-generated animals are as well executed as they were in “Jumanji” back in 1995. Yes, that was indeed sarcasm.

Outside of this budgetary mystery (where are you Hardy Boys?), this film is still plagued with disaster. Over the past few years, Carell has demonstrated that he has a real skill with comedy (“The 40 Year Old Virgin” which he also co-wrote) and can also be dramatically brilliant (“Little Miss Sunshine”). Here, Steve Oedekerk’s screenplay just doesn’t give him anything to work with (outside of bird shit sight gags and slapstick calamities we’ve seen more often than not in better films). There is even a beard joke in this film we heard earlier this season in “Knocked Up” involving a John Lennon reference. I guess we should expect nothing less than recycled jokes and ball-shots from the screenwriter of ”Kung Pow: Enter the Fist” and “Nutty Professor II: The Klumps.”


There you have it, the West (coincidently Christians, or perhaps an Ateis) is up to it's old trick. Mocking religion in the name of freedom of speech. They did it before with Bruce Almighty, the cartoons, and all. But no, that's not enough. They want to put it a notch higher.

Honestly, I'm not amused about what these people do. And since I'm not amused, I don't feel like making a fuss over it, pick up the fork and the torch, and go on a not-so-peaceful rally in front of the US Embassy. I'm not a big fan of physical activity anyway (though you can always give me a call for a walk. No matter how far. Have walked from Gombak to KL, and would like to try walking from JB to KL). But there are other people who will get angry, who will be amused in a negative way, and will react to the extreme. And I'm not talking about the Muslims only. The story about Noah affects both Christians and Muslims, since coincidently they share the same prophets (at least until Jesus).

Here the question of sensitivity arises. The West, particularly America, is now being targeted by terrorist. Some of it with religious agenda, some just want to wreak terror. And it all started because the West lack sensitivity. They can't say it in a way less destructive. They don't make it a point to see whether other cultures can accept what they are doing. And they forget that unbridled freedom have brought various civilizations to ruins.

My dear friends from the West. If you wish to be respected, learn to respect others. f you want your culture to be respected and accepted, learn to respect other culture. That means, learn the dos and don't about them. You guys know very well that your population is not the majority. Combine China and India, they'll swallow you whole. And as far as my knowledge goes, they are not amused with people making fun of their gods and deities. Religion is not a matter you can make a joke about. Or a comedy. If religion is a joke, then that makes morality irrelevant. Well, coming from America, I guess morality is irrelevant to you guys. Your current President doesn't seem to be a moral person. If he is, then he wouldn't be making a fool out of himself. Which means I shouldn't expect much of the people who put him in the White House, ie: Americans who voted for him.

So there. Be aware of the issues that may spark negative emotions by learning about their cultures.

Now, about understanding Islam. I noticed that the West often quote Islam with the Middle-Eastern culture. That's not the right way to understand Islam. If you want to understand about Islam, you have to take out "culture" from the equation. What drove many Muslims towards violence is not the religion, but the culture. And I can't really blame the West for having the misconception as well. Majority of the Muslims mistook their culture as the basis of Islamic teachings. Thus giving them the impression that their actions are righteous.

To differentiate between true Islamic principles and a culture, you have to spend some time with various Muslim communities and study them. Spending time with only one Muslim community may lead to a misconception, as their culture has already intertwined with Islamic principles. Take Malaysian Muslim society. We have various cultural events that were intertwined with Islamic concepts, such as adat bercukur. Those who are not informed might mistook the event as a religious event, since salawat, marhaban, and Quranic verses were recited. These events, may not be exercised in other Muslim communities, as it is not part of their culture.

I will discuss further about these 2 issues later, as discussing 2 issues in one post will only make the post a burden to read. Until then, stay tuned.

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Bloggers Are Not Immune

Bloggers don’t enjoy more rights

KUALA LUMPUR: Bloggers are as liable for defamation as publishers in any other medium, but the difficulty arises when there are anonymous postings on blogs.

According to University of Ulster (UK) senior lecturer in Law Dr Venkat Iyer, it is the anonymity that creates a legal “grey area”.

Dr Iyer said it was wrong to assume that bloggers enjoyed greater privileges.

“There have been cases in the West where legal action had been taken against websites for defamatory remarks and some website owners were also taken to court when an anonymous posting was made,” he said.

He was speaking to reporters after delivering a talk on “Defamation in Cyberspace” by the Kuala Lumpur Bar here yesterday as part of its ongoing legal education programme.

On the liability of companies whose employees blog, Dr Iyer said it depended on the company's policies on e-mail and IT facilities.

He said that if the employees used the company’s website or logo to blog, and if the company knew about it, then very likely the employee or employees would be served with a warning not to use the company’s assets.

“With this the liability reduces, but if the employee just uses the facilities of the company and blogs on his own site, then again if the company comes to know about it, very likely he would be served with a warning for using its facilities, premises and company time,” he said.

“And under those circumstances, if ever legal action is taken, then the company can defend itself by saying it had taken all the reasonable steps to ensure that the employee was prevented from doing what he did.”

He said the Internet was a unique medium, as it had a limitless potential audience, was easy to access, and had the ability to create communities regardless of geographical constraints.

Dr Iyer said that therefore the potential difficulties, among others that could arise, were the effects of republication of libellous matter, anonymity of authors, implications of hyperlinking, liability of intermediaries and effects of multiple format publication.

He said the cyber-defamation possibilities included e-mail messages, where risks are inherent when the recipient forwards such messages.

Dr Iyer said that when there are mailing lists the situation can be riskier as any member of a mailing list may reply with a defamatory statement that he intended only for the person who posted a particular message but inadvertently relayed it to everyone else.


Indeed we don't. Let me quote my mum:
"What you want to say is your right. The moment you've said it, it becomes other's right." -My Mum, Halijah Binti Nasir-

It's true. Thus the phrase, "watch what you were saying," comes into play. Say it in a manner less harmful. Can't say that I do it all the time, but I try as hard as I can to sprinkle humor on what I said. To dull the edge.

And there are some taboos as well. Take the picture posted by Tian Chua. That's going too far, even as a joke. He could at least put a disclaimer: "This is just the author's illustration of how the picture might look like". Something like that. Thus removing him from the blame of insulting, as he was just assuming that the picture might look like the picture he doctored.

However, the Government itself has to be neutral so that bloggers will not be victimized. There are some instances where bloggers were subjected to lawsuit for telling the truth. This can be very damaging not only to the blogsphere, but also for the country, as the people calling for lawsuit most of the time are corrupt people. People who make a living out of the sweat, blood and tear of their fellow countrymen. If the Government aims to have patriotic people, then the bloggers who dared to uncover corrupt personnel are the people the Government would like to have more of.